ABSTRACT
BackgroundIn 2012 the Swedish national guidelines for osteoarthritis (OA) were published. The guidelines implicit that all patients with OA should obtain information and supervised exercise as first-line intervention and that OA is a clinical, not radiological diagnosis. The Swedish OA registry contains data which measure compliance to the guidelines since 2008 [2].ObjectivesTo describe the trends over time from 2008 to 2021 for patients who have received first-line interventions for hip and knee OA in Sweden and adherence of the healthcare staff to the national guidelines.MethodsDescriptive registry-based study including patients with hip or knee OA who participated in first-line interventions including education and exercise. Data were extracted from the Swedish OA registry between January 1st, 2008, and December 31, 2021. The registry contains patient-reported outcomes and physiotherapist-reported outcomes. In this study the following physiotherapist-reported outcomes were described over time: radiological examination before first-line intervention, if the first-line intervention was given the first time the patient seek health care caused of OA, which explanation patients had been given about their disease, intake of painkillers before the start of first-line intervention and the percent who got supervised exercise >10 times according to the guidelines of OA in Sweden. The following patient-reported outcomes were described over time: mean BMI at the first visit, and mean age at the first visit. To be included in the study, participants had to meet the following criteria: i) clinical diagnosis of OA, with hip or knee OA as the most symptomatic joint, ii) provided 3-month follow-up.ResultsA total of 175 764 participants with hip or knee OA were included in the study.The trends from 2008-2021 showed that the proportion of patients who had a radiological examination before entering the first-line intervention decreased from 97 % to 65 % in men and from 95% to 62 % in women. The proportion of patients who get assess to first-line intervention the first time they seek for their symptoms increased from 4 % to 10 % both in men and women. People that get the correct information about OA increased from 15% to 40 %, and patients that get the explanation that OA was a tear and wear disease decreased from 30 % to 5%. The mean BMI (28) is unchanged over time. The mean age increased from 64 years to 67 years between 2008-2020 but decreased during the covid-19 pandemic to 64 years. The percentage that was given supervised exercise more than 10 times was constant between 2012-2020 at 30 % but decreased during the covid-19 pandemic to 20%.ConclusionThe results implicit that the implementation of a supported OA self-management program in Sweden has been successful and changed the care given to patients with OA in Sweden. However, the national guidelines for OA, have still not been fully implemented. We need to keep implementing the guidelines so all patients with OA get the first-line intervention at the right time.References[1]Anon. (2012). Nationella riktlinjer för rörelseorganens sjukdomar 2012 - stöd för styrning och ledning. Socialstyrelsen.[2]Thorstensson CA, Garellick G, Rystedt H, Dahlberg LE. Better Management of Patients with Osteoarthritis: Development and Nationwide Implementation of an Evidence-Based Supported Osteoarthritis Self-Management Programme. Musculoskeletal Care. 2015 Jun;13(2):67-75. doi: 10.1002/msc.1085. Epub 2014 Oct 24. PMID: 25345913.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundCOVID 19 infection could lead to different sequelae in survivors, known as post-COVID or long COVID 19 syndromes. Some of them are thought to be due to the thrombophylic changes observed in COVID 19 infection, but some are thought to be caused by the administrated (especially high dose) corticosteroid treatment. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVNFH) is a multifactorial disease which leads to compromised vascular supply, ischemia and finally necrosis of the femoral head. As corticosteroids usage and thrombophylic states are among the main known risk factors for the development AVNFH [1], it could be presumed that the frequency of this disease will increase with the COVID 19 pandemic. The exact corticosteroid dose needed for the development of AVNFH is not clear, but it has been stated that a higher daily dose and a larger total cumulative dose increase substantially the risk for the development of osteonecrosis [2].ObjectivesTo describe in detail the characteristics of AVNFH diagnosed in patients after COVID 19 infection.MethodsThe study was done in a tertiary university rheumatological clinic. Data was extracted from the records of patients who have been referred to the clinic because of hip pain between June and December 2022. Inclusion criteria were: - a new onset of uni-or bilateral hip pain that started after a documented COVID 19 infection;and an MRI scan of the hip joints showing osteonecrosis of one or both femoral heads. Exclusion criteria were the presence of hip pain prior to the COVID 19 infection, anamnesis of traumatic injuries of the hips or pelvis, personal history of hypercoagulable states.ResultsNine patients (4 women and 5 men) with an average age 59.1 years (range 38-72) were included in the study. Four patients had been diagnosed with bilateral and five – with unilateral AVNFH, thus 13 hip joints were analysed in total (8 left and 5 right sided). The mean time lap between the COVID 19 infection and the start of the hip pain was 26.2 weeks (range 10-48 weeks). All patients had limited and painful movement in their symptomatic hip(s), especially internal rotation and four of the patients had also elevated CRP levels (mean 11.7 mg/L). The stage of the AVNFH was evaluated according to the Ficat-Arlet classification (0-IV stage). In four hips the AVNFH was stage I, five hips were classified as stage II and the remaining four joints - as stage III. All symptomatic hip joints exhibited effusion/synovitis on both ultrasound examination and the corresponding MRI scan. It should be noted that the presence of hip effusion was found to be related with a worse prognosis in AVNFH [1]. In three patients the amount of the effusion required arthrocentesis and fluid aspiration. The analysis of the joint fluid was consistent with a degenerative disease (i.e., low WBC count with predominant lymphocytes and no crystals). All patients included in our study had received corticosteroids during their COVID19 infection, while 6 of the patients had also been hospitalized due to more severe disease. According to the patients' documentation, the mean cumulative dose of the received corticosteroids was 936.2 mg prednisolone equivalent per patient (range 187-2272 mg).ConclusionAVNFH must not be overlooked in a new onset hip pain after COVID 19 infection. Our results show that corticosteroids administrated during the infection and the presence of hip joint effusion on ultrasound are especially suggestive for the development of osteonecrosis, as they were registered in all of our patients. The presence of these two factors necessitates patient referral for an MRI scan of the hips, in order that AVNFH be detected timely.References[1]Petek D, Hannouche D, Suva D. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: pathophysiology and current concepts of treatment. EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Mar 15;4(3):85-97.[2]Kerachian MA, Séguin C, Harvey EJ. Glucocorticoids in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a new understanding of the mechanisms of action. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2009 Apr;114(3-5):121-8.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosur of InterestsPLAMEN TODOROV Speakers bureau: speaker at national level for AbbVie, Novartis and UCB, Lily Mekenyan: None declared, Anastas Batalov Speakers bureau: Speaker at national level for AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, Stada, Elly Lilly.
ABSTRACT
AimsThis study aimed to investigate the estimated change in primary and revision arthroplasty rate in the Netherlands and Denmark for hips, knees, and shoulders during the COVID- 19 pandemic in 2020 (COVID-period). Additional points of focus included the comparison of patient characteristics and hospital type (2019 vs COVID-period), and the estimated loss of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and impact on waiting lists.MethodsAll hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasties (2014 to 2020) from the Dutch Arthroplasty Reg-ister, and hip and knee arthroplasties from the Danish Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Registries, were included. The expected number of arthroplasties per month in 2020 was estimated using Poisson regression, taking into account changes in age and sex distribution of the general Dutch/Danish population over time, calculating observed/expected (O/E) ratios. Country-specific proportions of patient characteristics and hospital type were calculated per indication category (osteoarthritis/other elective/acute). Waiting list outcomes including QALYs were estimated by modelling virtual waiting lists including 0%, 5% and 10% extra capacity.ResultsDuring COVID-period, fewer arthroplasties were performed than expected (Netherlands: 20%;Denmark: 5%), with the lowest O/E in April. In the Netherlands, more acute indica-tions were prioritized, resulting in more American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III to IV patients receiving surgery. In both countries, no other patient prioritization was present. Relatively more arthroplasties were performed in private hospitals. There were no clinically relevant differences in revision arthroplasties between pre- COVID and COVID-period. Esti-mated total health loss depending on extra capacity ranged from: 19,800 to 29,400 QALYs (Netherlands): 1,700 to 2,400 QALYs (Denmark). With no extra capacity it will take > 30 years to deplete the waiting lists.ConclusionThe COVID- 19 pandemic had an enormous negative effect on arthroplasty rates, but more in the Netherlands than Denmark. In the Netherlands, hip and shoulder patients with acute indications were prioritized. Private hospitals filled in part of the capacity gap. QALY loss due to postponed arthroplasty surgeries is considerable.
ABSTRACT
Aim: The purpose of this study is to create a scoring system to decide which patient will take maximum precautions while the covid 19 disease continues. Taking maximum precautions is not always possible in all surgical procedures. Therefore, surgical scoring in asymptomatic patients, selecting patients who need maximum precautions, and taking the necessary precautions for these patients will prevent unnecessary use of the equipment. Material(s) and Method(s): A total of 347 who were surgically treated for emergency or elective procedures between March 11 and November 11, 2020 were included in the study. Of these patients, 277 patients whose data could be accessed were included in the study. A scoring system has been created. Patients were divided into 2 groups: bearing low and high risk. Patients with a score above 10 were identified as having a high surgical risk, and those with a score below 10 were identified as having a low surgical risk. Result(s): There were 132 patients in Group 1 and 145 patients in Group 2. It was observed that 29 of 277 patients became positive within the first month. Two of these patients were in Group 1 and 27 of them were in Group 2. It was observed that COVID-19 antibody or PCR tests gave more positive results in patients in Group 2 in the first month compared to two patients in Group 1. The highest positivity rate in Group 2 was observed in the arthroscopy group. Discussion(s): Advanced precautions should be taken in patients with high surgical risk scores. In patients with low surgical risk scores, less strict precautions can be taken.Copyright © 2023, Derman Medical Publishing. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Hip fractures among elderly patients are surgical emergencies. During COVID-19 pandemic time, many such patients could not be operated at early time because of the limitation of the medical resources, the risk of infection and redirection of medical attention to a severe infective health problem. METHODS: A search of electronic databases (PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) with the keywords "COVID", "COVID-19â³, "SARS-COV-2", "Corona", "pandemic", "hip fracture", "trochanteric fracture" and "neck femur fracture" revealed 64 studies evaluating treatment of hip fracture in elderly patients during COVID-19 pandemic time. The 30-day mortality rate, inpatient mortality rate, critical care/special care need, readmission rate and complications rate in both groups were evaluated. Data were analyzed using Review Manager (RevMan) V.5.3. RESULTS: After screening, 7 studies were identified that described the mortality and morbidity in hip fractures in both COVID-19 infected (COVID-19 +) and non-infected (COVID-19 -) patients. There were significantly increased risks of 30-day mortality (32.23% COVID-19 + death vs. 8.85% COVID-19 - death) and inpatient mortality (29.33% vs. 2.62%) among COVID-19 + patients with odds ratio (OR) of 4.84 (95% CI: 3.13-7.47, p < 0.00001) and 15.12 (95% CI: 6.12-37.37, p < 0.00001), respectively. The COVID-19 + patients needed more critical care admission (OR = 5.08, 95% CI: 1.49-17.30, p < 0.009) and they remain admitted for a longer time in hospital (MD = 3.6, 95% CI: 1.74-5.45, p = 0.0001); but there was no difference in readmission rate between these 2 groups. The risks of overall complications (OR = 17.22), development of pneumonia (OR = 22.25), and acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute respiratory failure (OR = 32.96) were significantly high among COVID-19 + patients compared to COVID-19 - patients. CONCLUSIONS: There are increased risks of the 30-day mortality, inpatient mortality and critical care admission among hip fracture patients who are COVID-19 +. The chances of developing pneumonia and acute respiratory failure are more in COVID-19 + patients than in COVID-19 â patients.
ABSTRACT
Background During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, telemedicine has provided new means of patient care while still allowing for physical examination and history to be obtained. Hip ailments are a common musculoskeletal problem leading to limited function. Today, we lack a standardized telemedicine hip evaluation protocol. Aim The aim of this manuscript is to provide an efficient means of extracting relevant information while performing telemedicine examinations of the hip. Methods The authors have created a step-by-step evaluation guide for physicians to evaluate hip complaints, including inspection, palpation, range of motion, strength testing, functional assessment, gait analysis, and special testing, with images of each maneuver. Results We have developed a table of evaluation questions and instructions and a glossary of images of each maneuver to facilitate hip examination via telemedicine. Conclusions This manuscript provides a structured template for performing a telehealth examination of hip ailments.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head is a common indication for total hip arthroplasty (THA). It is unclear to what extent the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted its incidence. Theoretically, the combination of microvascular thromboses and corticosteroid use in patients who have COVID-19 may increase the risk of osteonecrosis. We aimed to (1) assess recent osteonecrosis trends and (2) investigate if a history of COVID-19 diagnosis is associated with osteonecrosis. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized a large national database between 2016 and 2021. Osteonecrosis incidence in 2016 to 2019 was compared to 2020 to 2021. Secondly, utilizing a cohort from April 2020 through December 2021, we investigated whether a prior COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with osteonecrosis. For both comparisons, Chi-square tests were applied. RESULTS: Among 1,127,796 THAs performed between 2016 and 2021, we found an osteonecrosis incidence of 1.6% (n = 5,812) in 2020 to 2021 compared to 1.4% (n = 10,974) in 2016 to 2019; P < .0001. Furthermore, using April 2020 to December 2021 data from 248,183 THAs, we found that osteonecrosis was more common among those who had a history of COVID-19 (3.9%; 130 of 3,313) compared to patients who had no COVID-19 history (3.0%; 7,266 of 244,870); P = .001). CONCLUSION: Osteonecrosis incidence was higher in 2020 to 2021 compared to previous years and a previous COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with a greater likelihood of osteonecrosis. These findings suggest a role of the COVID-19 pandemic on an increased osteonecrosis incidence. Continued monitoring is necessary to fully understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on THA care and outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Context: Anticoagulants are used to prevent and treat venous thromboembolism (VTE), such as deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in COVID-19 for better outcomes. Aim: This study aims to explore clinical outcomes and factors affecting VTE among COVID-19 patients. Settings and Design: The study design involved a retrospective cohort study. Study Methods: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients in a tertiary hospital prescribed subcutaneous (SC) anticoagulants were included. Statistical Analysis Used: Multiple logistic regression was performed to determine factors affecting VTE among subjects. Results: A total of 450 patients were included. Types of anticoagulants include fondaparinux (n = 114, 38.1%), enoxaparin (n = 113, 37.8%), and heparin (n = 72, 24.1%). 423 (94.0%) patients were discharged well, 27 (6.0%) patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The primary outcome was the prevalence of VTE, which occurred in 19.3% (n = 87) patients, with 80 (92.0%) reporting DVT and 7 (8.0%) reporting PE. The secondary outcome, which was the average length of hospital stay was 9.9 (+/-4.7) days. Factors of VTE occurrence were likely in patients not prescribed SC anticoagulants compared to those prescribed with SC anticoagulants (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 54.330, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.086, 416.526), treatment with fondaparinux compared to heparin (aOR 2.502, 95% CI: 1.175, 5.327), and less likely in those discharged well compared to patients in the ICU (aOR 0.139, 95% CI: 0.053, 0.361). Conclusions: Careful monitoring is required to reduce VTE risk in COVID-19 patients.
ABSTRACT
History: A 20 year old D1 men's basketball player with a history of COVID the month prior presented with worsening low back pain. He denied any injury, but reported the pain started as low back discomfort after a basketball game the week prior. He noted a progression and radiation of pain down his right lower extremity to his toes. He had tried physical therapy and dry needling, as well as cyclobenzaprine and naproxen from team physicians with mild improvement. The pain worsened and he went to the ED for evaluation. He was afebrile and had a lumbar radiograph with no acute fracture, grade 1 anterolisthesis of L5 on S1. He was discharged home with norco. Over the next 2 days, he developed chills and in the context of his worsening back pain, his team physicians ordered an MRI. Physical Exam: BMI 26.9 Temp 97.9degree Heart rate: 73 Respiratory rate 14 BP: 124/64 MSK: Spine- Intact skin with generalized pain over lumbar area, worse over the right paraspinal musculature. 5/5 strength of bilateral lower extremity flexion and extension of his hips, knees, and plantar and dorsiflexion of ankles and toes. Bilateral intact sensibility in the sciatic, femoral, superficial, and deep peroneal, sural, and saphenous nerve distributions. Slightly diminished sensibility over the right deep peroneal nerve distribution compared to left. 2/4 patellar and achilles DTRs. No clonus, downgoing Babinski sign. Positive straight leg raise at 45 degrees with the right lower extremity. Differential Diagnosis: 141. Sciatica 142. Lumbar Muscle Strain 143. Disk Herniation 144. Spondylolisthesis 145. Vertebral Osteomyelitis Test Results: CBC:WBC10, HGB13.2, neutrophils 75.7% (red 45%-74%). Unremarkable CMP. CRP =7.31, ESR 23 Blood culture negative, throat culture negative. TB test negative. COVID test negative. Flu test negative. Urine culture and UDS negative. HIV test negative. Procalcitonin of 0.07. IR guided aspiration and bacterial Culture yielded MSSA. MRI w/contrast: showing L1-L4 facet edema concerning for infectious spondylitis, intramuscular, and epidural abscess. Final Diagnosis: Acute intramuscular abscess, vertebral osteomyelitis, with epidural abscess. Discussion(s): Vertebral osteomyelitis is a serious but quite rare disease in the immunocompetent, elite athlete population. Staphylococcus Aureus is the culprit a majority of the time, with only 50% of cases showing neurologic symptoms. This case was unique given the proximity to a dry needling treatment which is the only explainable vector of infection, normal blood cultures in this disease which hematogenously spreads, negativeHIV and other infectious disease testing, and otherwise benign history. Early recognition of this disease yields better outcomes and reduces incidence of severe debility. 5% to 10%of patients experience recurrence of back pain or osteomyelitis later on in life. Outcome(s): Patient was hospitalized and started on Cefepime and Vancomycin. Had an echocardiogram revealing changes consistent with athlete's heart without signs of vegetation on his cardiac valves. Neurosurgery declined to treat surgically. He continued to improve until he was ultimately discharged on hospital day 4 with a picc line and Nafcillin and was later changed to oral augmentin per ID. Follow-Up: By his 6 week follow-up visit with infectious disease and the team physicians, his back pain had completely resolved and was cleared to start a return to play protocol. There was no progression of disease since starting antibiotics, and no recurrence of back pain since treatment.
ABSTRACT
OBjECTivE The efficient use of wards intended for elective surgeries is essential to resolve cases on the surgical waiting list. This study aims to estimate the efficiency of ward use in the Chilean public health system between 2018 and 2021.METHoDS The design was an ecological study. Section A.21 of the database constructed by the monthly statistical summaries that each public health network facility reported to the Ministry of Health between 2018 and 2021 was analyzed. Data from subsections A, E, and F were extracted: ward staffing, total elective surgeries by specialty, number, and causes of cancelation of elective sur-geries. Then, the surgical performance during working hours and the percentage of hourly oc-cupancy for a working day was estimated. Additionally, an analysis was made by region with data from 2021.RESulTS The percentage of elective wards relative to staffed wards ranged from 81.1% to 94.1%, while those enabled in relation to staffed wards ranged from 70.5% to 90.4% during 2018 and 2021. The total number of surgeries was highest in 2019 (n = 416 339), but for 2018, 2020, and 2021 it ranged from 259 000 to 297 000. Cancelations ranged between 10.8% (2019) and 6.9% (2021), with the leading cause being patient-related. When analyzing the number of cases canceled monthly by facility, we saw that the leading cause was trade union-related. The maximum throughput of a ward intended for elective surgery was reached in 2019 with 2.5 surgeries;in 2018, 2020, and 2021, the throughput was around two surgeries per enabled ward for elective surgery. The percentage of ward time occupied during working hours as compared to a contract day ranged from 80.7% (2018) and 56.8% (2020). CoNCluSioNS All the parameters found and estimated in this study show an inefficient utilization of operating rooms in Chilean public healthcare facilities.
ABSTRACT
PurposeThis study aims to identify the dietary patterns of two groups of subjects (with and without COVID-19), and to assess the relationship of findings with the prognosis of COVID-19 and metabolic risk parameters.Design/methodology/approachThis study included 100 individuals in the age range of 19–65 years. The medical history, and data on biochemical, hematological and inflammatory indicators were retrieved from the files. A questionnaire for the 24-h food record and the food intake frequency was administered in face-to-face interviews, and dietary patterns of subjects were assessed.FindingsIn individuals with COVID-19, the hip circumference, the waist-hip ratio and the body fat percentage were significantly higher (p < 0.05), and the muscle mass percentage was significantly lower (p < 0.05). Mediterranean diet adherence screener (MEDAS), dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) and healthy eating ındex-2015 (HEI-2015) scores were low in the two groups. A linear correlation of DASH scores was found with the muscle mass percentage (p = 0.046) and a significant inverse correlation of with the body fat percentage (p = 0.006). HEI-2015 scores were significantly and negatively correlated with body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, hip circumference and neck circumference (p < 0.05). Every one-unit increase in MEDAS, DASH and HEI-2015 scores caused reductions in C-reactive protein levels at different magnitudes. Troponin-I was significantly and negatively correlated with fruit intake (p = 0.044), a component of a Mediterranean diet and with HEI-2015 total scores (p = 0.032).Research limitations/implicationsThe limitation of this study includes the small sample size and the lack of dietary interventions. Another limitation is the use of the food recall method for the assessment of dietary patterns. This way assessments were performed based on participants' memory and statements.Practical implicationsFollowing a healthy diet pattern can help reduce the metabolic risks of COVÍD-19 disease.Originality/valueDespite these limitations, this study is valuable because, to the best of the authors' knowledge, it is the first study demonstrating the association of dietary patterns with disease prognosis and metabolic risks concerning COVID-19. This study suggests that dietary patterns during the COVID-19 process may be associated with several metabolic risks and inflammatory biomarkers.
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims Through the COVID pandemic there have emerged reports of autoimmunity or new rheumatic diseases presenting in patients after they had COVID-19. This is thought to be caused by cross-reactivity of the COVID-19 spike protein to human antigens. Given the use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations which express the spike protein we might expect to see presentation of new rheumatic diseases following their use. We discuss a case where this appears to have occurred. Methods Our patient is a 24-year-old male with mixed phenotype acute leukaemia who had been treated with allogenic stem cell transplant and was currently in remission. He presented with fevers, palpitations, myalgia and bilateral arm and leg swelling. Symptoms began the day after receiving the first dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer/BioNTech.) There were no other symptoms or recent change in medications. Physical examination revealed tender oedema in his forearms, biceps and thighs bilaterally with sparring of the hands. He had reduced power with shoulder (MRC 3/5), elbow (4), wrist (4+) and hip (4) movements. Observations revealed tachycardia and fevers up to 40C. Results Laboratory studies showed markedly elevated C-reactive protein (202), creatinine kinase (6697) and troponin (593) whilst investigations for infection were negative. An autoimmune panel was positive for anti- PM-SCL-75-Ab. An electrocardiogram showed sinus tachycardia. Echocardiogram was normal. Bilateral upper limb dopplers revealed no deep vein thrombus. An MRI of his thighs showed diffuse symmetrical oedema within the muscles, in keeping with an inflammatory myositis. A quadricep muscle biopsy showed evidence of MHC class 1 up-regulation, suggesting an inflammatory process. In addition, there were numerous macrophages evident in the endomysium. While this can be seen in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), they would usually be found in the perimysium. After discussion between haematology, rheumatology and neurology, this was felt to be a case of vaccine induced myositis and myocarditis. Autoimmune myositis was thought to be less likely due to the relative sparing of the hands and the absence of Raynaud's phenomenon. 1 gram of intravenous methylprednisolone was then given for 3 days. The patient had a marked response with defervescence, improving laboratory markers, improved myalgia and decreased limb swelling. The patient was stepped down to a reducing regime of prednisolone and discharged. Due to relapse whilst weaning he has started on mycophenalate mofetil and rituximab and now continues to improve. Conclusion There are case reports of myositis following COVID-19 vaccination but our patient's case is complicated by the differential diagnosis of GVHD and concurrent myocarditis. Ongoing work is needed to clarify the exact link between vaccination and the presentation of a new inflammatory myositis, but it is important to recognise and start treatment early in order to preserve muscle bulk and ensure recovery.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To document discharge locations for geriatric patients treated for a hip fracture before and during the COVID pandemic and subsequent changes in outcomes seen between each cohort. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Academic medical center. Patients/Participants: Two matched cohorts of 100 patients with hip fracture treated pre-COVID (February-May 2019) and during COVID (February-May 2020). Intervention: Discharge location and COVID status on admission. Discharge locations were home (home independently or home with health services) versus facility [subacute nursing facility (SNF) or acute rehabilitation facility]. Main Outcome Measurements: Readmissions, inpatient and 1-year mortality, and 1-year functional outcomes (EQ5D-3L). Results: In COVID+ patients, 93% (13/14) were discharged to a facility, 62% (8/13) of whom passed away within 1 year of discharge. Of COVID+ patients discharged to an SNF, 80% (8/10) died within 1 year. Patients discharged to an SNF in 2020 were 1.8x more likely to die within 1 year compared with 2019 (P = 0.029). COVID- patients discharged to an SNF in 2020 had a 3x increased 30-day mortality rate and 1.5x increased 1-year mortality rate compared with 2019. Patients discharged to an acute rehabilitation facility in 2020 had higher rates of 90-day readmission. There was no difference in functional outcomes. Conclusions: All patients, including COVID- patients, discharged to all discharge locations during the onset of the pandemic experienced a higher mortality rate as compared with prepandemic. This was most pronounced in patients discharged to a skilled nursing facility in 2020 during the early stages of the pandemic. If this trend continues, it suggests that during COVID waves, discharge planning should be conducted with the understanding that no options eliminate the increased risks associated with the pandemic. Level of Evidence: III.
ABSTRACT
Purpose of Study The detrimental long-term effects of obesity are well-described in literature;however, there has been recently emerging evidence describing a possible mortality benefit in obese patients with acute injury. The scope of this review is to provide an overview of the ongoing debate surrounding this observation. We focused our discussion on evaluating the evidences suggesting an impact of obesity and overweight on multiple acute medical conditions. Methods Used We searched the PubMed database with the keywords 'obesity', 'paradox', 'trauma', 'mortality', 'BMI', 'cancer', 'sepsis', 'lung injury', 'stroke', 'COVID', and 'myocardial infarct' from inception to 2020 and selected 40 relevant papers discussing the relationship between mortality and BMI in the setting of these stressors, and the mechanisms behind them. Summary of Results Amongst the fields of blunt trauma, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and critical care admissions for sepsis and lung injury, there are a growing amount of evidences supporting the existence of a paradoxical mortality benefit with overweight and mild obesity compared to normal and lean BMI. These findings must be attenuated with study design and BMI limitations, as well as biases prevalent throughout these studies. Although several hypotheses have been proposed, the exact mechanisms behind this relationship are largely unknown. Conclusions This survey of the obesity paradox shows promise in regard to overweight and mild obesity helping with survival post-acute illness, possibly due to metabolic reserves, antiinflammatory, and anti-oncogenic conditions seen in obesity. We recommend addressing current major limitations by having future studies prospectively designed to evaluate alternative body weight metrics such as waist-to-hip ratio or waist circumference, with special attention to the timing of body weight measurements and its progression in the patient's life. In the future, elucidating the biological mechanisms of this relationship may allow us to adapt our recommendations to the patients and help direct optimal therapeutic approach in the management of certain acute pathologies.
ABSTRACT
Introduction and Aim: Job and stress are not mutually exclusive;in fact, stress is inherent to job. In the present era of COVID pandemic, working as health care providers may entail highest levels of stress leading to burnout. Thus, affecting work efficiency of faculty, in turn reflecting on students' performance and health care services to patients. However, de-stressors like yoga and art-based interventions are scarce and not well documented to date. Hence, the present study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of stress alleviating yoga and creative art therapy through interprofessional collaborative approach. Method(s): Sixty medical faculty of either gender aging 30-60 years, were randomly divided into two equal groups-control and intervention group. The intervention group underwent yoga and creative art therapy for 10 days duration each. International stress management association (ISMA) stress questionnaire and Kessler's psychological distress (K-10) scale were administered before and post-intervention, to compare the stress levels. Blood pressure (BP), pulse rate, body mass index (BMI) and waist hip ratio (WHR) were also measured. Comparative analysis of pre-post test scores was done using Student's paired 't' test. Result(s): According to ISMA and K-10 scores, the intervention group showed statistically significant (p <= 0.05) decrease in stress levels among faculty. However, BP, BMI and WHR didn't show any significant change after the intervention. Conclusion(s): Yoga and art therapy were proved to be beneficial in reducing the stress levels among faculty significantly. Comparative analysis also showed significant reduction irrespective of their gender and specialty.Copyright © 2023, Indian Association of Biomedical Scientists. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Case Report: It is well documented that Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) patients who suffer cardiac injury have a higher mortality rate, however the exact mechanism of cardiac injury and potential complications are still unknown. Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy (TCM), which was first described in 1990 in Japan, is characterized by a transient systolic and diastolic left ventricular dysfunction with a range of wall motion abnormalities predominantly affecting women often following an emotional or physical trigger. Though TCM is seen less commonly as a cardiac complication of COVID-19, with increasing rates of cardiovascular events due to COVID-19, TCM should be taken into consideration as a potential diagnosis for a COVID-19 positive patient. Case Description: The case of a 75-year old female with a history significant for hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease presented to the Emergency Department after a ground level fall and subsequent left hip pain. Upon primary survey, EKG showed persistent sinus tachycardia in the 130-150s, with intermittent borderline dynamic changes and a troponin that was mildly elevated at 0.10, and an initial false negative COVID-19 test. Preoperative echocardiogram showed normal left ventricle size, no regional wall abnormalities, and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 60-65%. In post-operative care, EKG illustrated dynamic changes in the form of ST elevation in the lateral precordial leads, as well as an increase in the cardiac troponins, from 0.07 to 3.51. A subsequent echocardiogram illustrated a drop in her ejection fraction from 60-65% to 30-35%, with evidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction that was not noted on previous echocardiograms. Following the Mayo clinic diagnostic criteria, this patient met the diagnostic criteria for TCM, as evident by new electrocardiograph findings, non-obstructive cardiac catherization findings, echocardiogram findings illustrating transient left ventricular systolic dysfunction, modest elevations in cardiac troponins as well as the patient being a post-menopausal female. Subsequent echocardiogram on 2 week follow up showed a rebound in her ejection fraction to 50-55%. Discussion(s): Possible outcomes of TCM include cardiogenic shock, respiratory failure, and death. It is imperative that clinicians consider TCM as a possible diagnosis when treating COVID-19 patients that may be exhibiting cardiac complications. Frequent ECG monitoring and a vigilant differential should include TCM in patients presenting with COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Rehabilitation to address modifiable factors associated with chronic hip-related groin pain (CHRGP) may lead to reduced pain and improved function, yet little is known about its effectiveness. We assessed the preliminary effects of two interventions that target two distinct mechanisms, sensory disturbances and abnormal movement patterns. Sensory disturbances such as peripheral and central sensitization may contribute to pain persistence long after initial injury. Joint mobilization (JtMob) may impart a neurophysiological response within the nervous system that results in pain reduction and improved mobility. Abnormal movement patterns may create altered mechanical stresses on hip joint structures, resulting in pain and activity limitations. Movement pattern training (MoveTrain) may improve movement patterns and thus patient function. Method(s): Patients with CHRGP, 18-40, were enrolled. Assessments included self-report questionnaires, clinical exam, and quantitative sensory testing. Outcomes included the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), a patient-reported outcome;frontal plane kinematics of hip, pelvis, and trunk during single leg squat;and pain pressure threshold (PPT) assessed at the anterior groin of the most bothersome hip and dominant thenar eminence (local and generalized pressure hypersensitivity, respectively). Patients were randomized to JtMob or MoveTrain in a 1:1 ratio stratified by sex and HOOS Symptoms. Treatment for both groups included 10 individualized visits over 12 weeks with a trained physical therapist (PT);assessment of patient goals and education which focused on patient-specific tasks reported by the patient to be symptom-producing;instruction in a home exercise program (HEP);and handouts that provided education, description and benefits of assigned treatment and instructions for HEP. The key element of JtMob was PT-provided manual techniques using specific criteria to determine the joint mobilization techniques and parameters used for each patient. The patient's symptom report to each technique was monitored and if indicated, the technique modified according to our outlined procedures. The HEP included flexibility exercises. The key element of MoveTrain was task-specific instruction to correct abnormal movement patterns displayed during daily and patient-specific tasks. For example, hip adduction was minimized during a step descent. The HEP included repeated practice of modified tasks. Task difficulty was progressed based on each patient's performance. Immediately after treatment completion, patients returned for follow up assessment. To assess treatment sustainability after the active treatment phase, we collected HOOS at 6 and 12 months (extended follow-up), and kinematics and PPT at 12 months. Data from patients who provided any data after baseline were analyzed with a repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) with baseline value as a covariate, patient as a random effect, and an autoregressive covariance structure. After adjusting for baseline, the between-group difference in change from post-treatment to each extended follow-up results from pre-planned statistical contrasts in a RM-ANOVA that includes main effects for treatment group, visit and the group by visit interaction. The within-group treatment effect at each extended follow-up was calculated by subtracting the earlier time point from the later follow-up within each treatment group. Dependent samples t-tests were used to assess the degree of within-group change. Result(s): Demographics and outcome data are provided in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Thirty-three patients with CHRGP were randomized and 29 (88%) provided post-treatment data. Four patients did not complete treatment or post-treatment testing (3 due to COVID pandemic, 1 lost to follow up);6 patients did not complete 12 month laboratory testing (due to pandemic), but did complete 12 month questionnaires. Previously, we reported that both groups reported clinically important improvements in HOOS subscales and MoveTrain group improved hip and pelvis kinematics immediately after treatment compared to baseline. After adjusting for baseline, there were no between-group differences in change in outcomes between post-treatment and extended follow-up when comparing JtMob and MoveTrain, indicating that treatment effects immediately post-treatment were maintained at 12 months after treatment completion. Conclusion(s): Our preliminary findings suggest that 12 weeks of JtMob or MoveTrain, may result in improvements in patient-reported pain and function and these effects may persist 12 months after treatment completion. A future, larger trial to definitively assess the efficacy of JtMob and MoveTrain and identify factors associated with long-term outcomes will improve our ability to develop treatment strategies for people with CHRGP. [Formula presented] [Formula presented]Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: Many females worldwide have reported abnormalities in their menstrual patterns post-COVID-19 vaccination. The present study was conducted to determine the impact of the COVID-19 vaccination on menstrual patterns among female nursing and paramedical students at a peripheral medical college in eastern India. Material(s) and Method(s): The cross-sectional, online self-administered survey was conducted using Microsoft Forms after taking institutional ethical clearance and informed consent from the participants. Two hundred BSc nursing and paramedical students who had received two doses of COVID vaccination (Covaxin or Covishield) and were not suffering from any endocrinopathies, bleeding disorders, structural gynecological abnormalities, or taking any medication known to affect the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis were included in the study. The questionnaire included menstrual length cycle length and amount of bleeding and there were no direct identifiers. Result(s): The participants reported a significant increase in the amount of bleeding on the heaviest day (mean +/- standard deviation [SD] of the number of pads used was 3.52 +/- 1.15 during prevaccination months vs. 4.64 +/- 1.36 during postvaccination months;P < 0.001) following vaccination. A similar result of increased bleeding on the heaviest day of the period was obtained in both the Covaxin group (mean +/- SD: 3.08 +/- 1.16 vs. 4.88 +/- 1.53;P: 0.001) and the Covishield group (mean +/- SD: 3.59 +/- 1.13 vs. 4.6 +/- 1.34;P < 0.001). No difference in change in the menstrual pattern was observed between the two groups who had received two different types of vaccine (P: 0.527). Conclusion(s): The study showed a possible connection between the COVID-19 vaccination and the change in menstrual patterns.Copyright © 2023 Authors. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Purpose of Study: Total knee (TKA) and hip (THA) arthroplasty procedures are recognized as effective treatments for osteoarthritis of the knee and hip joints which are the leading causes of lower extremity disability among older adults. Previous studies have demonstrated a variance in patients electing to undergo these interventions with non-White patients having significantly lower utilization rates. Our study examined if these disparities continued to exist during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Methods Used: This retrospective cohort study included 580 patients who underwent TKA or THA in 2020 and 2021 in a racially diverse region in Washington State. Demographic data, comorbidities, and post-surgical outcomes were recorded. Patients were stratified as those identifying as White (n=490, 84.5%) or Hispanic/ Latino (n=65, 11.2%). Patients identifying with other races (n=25, 4.3%) were excluded from the study due to small sample sizes. Differences between our two groups were examined using a chi-square test for categorical variables and an independent t-test for continuous variables. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Summary of Results: Compared to the White patients, Hispanic/ Latino identifying patients were younger (61.9+/-12.79 years versus 68.58+/-9.00 years;P <0.001), had lower Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (P=0.019), and were more likely to use non-Medicare or Medicaid insurance (P <0.001). No differences were observed in postoperative complication (P=0.632) and COVID-19 infection (P=0.465) rates between the groups. Conclusion(s): Although Hispanic/ Latino identifying patients in this region constitute 45.8% of our study population according to the most recent census tabulation, they accounted for only 11.2% of the patients in our study. These patients were also younger, had fewer comorbidities, and tended to use non-Medicare or Medicaid insurance suggesting an exclusive Hispanic/ Latino patient population electing to undergo TKA or THA procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies controlling for osteoarthritis risk factors and patients' election of treatment options may explain these disparities we have observed.
ABSTRACT
Aim: Determine the clinical utility and economic differences over a 90-day period between robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RATHA) and manual total hip arthroplasty (MTHA). Methods: Leveraging a nationwide commercial payer database, pre-covid THA procedures were identified. Following a 1:5 propensity score match, 1732 RATHA and 8660 MTHA patients were analyzed. Index costs, index lengths of-stay, and 90-day episode-of-care utilization and costs were evaluated. Results: Episode of care costs for RATHA was found to be $1573 lower compared with MTHA (p < 0.0001). Post-index hospital utilization was significantly less likely to occur for RATHA compared with MTHA. Total index costs were also significantly lower for RATHA versus MTHA (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Index and post-index EOC hospital utilization and costs were lower for RATHA compared with MTHA.